The general feeling amongst intelligent, consensual players is of course that everyone is free to define those terms in any way they see fit. And I agree, but I also feel that, not only for newbies, it is important to try and define this sort of label at least once, for oneself.
How about these statements for example?
A slave is someone who has 'given up all rights of individuality and self-determination'.
Or how about this one: 'A slave is not neccessarily submissive'...
Or perhaps 'these terms define a certain level of permnanence in the relationship'?
What do you think?
Love,
Aidan x
BiZarre Events - London's Most Extreme Fetish Sex Parties!
Web: http://www.bizarre-events.com
Email: bizarreeventslondon@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think a 'Slave' is very intense form of submissive..
ReplyDeletei can submit, i can't be a slave.. too much like what i already go through in life
ReplyDeleteA slave knows exactly what they want but a submissive explores what they want!
ReplyDeleteHow do you feel about this thought? A slave obeys, and a submissive pleases...???
ReplyDelete...this would indicate a difference in intend on the part of the slave/sub, I think.
ReplyDelete...this would (potentially) indicate a difference in intend on the part of the slave/sub, I think.
ReplyDeleteAnother take on this I've read recently is this: "a submissive is relationship oriented whereas a slave is task oriented".
ReplyDeleteok that i can agree with based on how people have thought they would treat me when they had the silly idea they could Dom me
ReplyDelete